Finding the AI Sweet Spot

A Legitimate Use of AI in Academic Writing While Adhering to Strict Policies

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the position of the institution where the author currently serves. Students should consult their own institution's and professors' policies regarding the use of AI in academic work. These positions are typically stated in course syllabi, style guides, or other institutional writing guidelines.

In my previous article, "AI in Academics: Where Do We Draw the Line?", I explored the emerging questions surrounding artificial intelligence in academic settings. As educators and institutions continue grappling with this rapidly evolving technology, one thing has become clear: there is no one-size-fits-all approach to AI policies in academia.

The Evolving Landscape of AI Policies

Academic institutions are still in the experimental phase of determining appropriate boundaries for AI use. Some universities and seminaries have embraced AI as a learning tool, incorporating it into their curriculum and encouraging students to develop AI literacy. Others have adopted more restrictive approaches, placing strict limitations on how students can engage with these technologies.

This policy landscape remains in flux. What we're witnessing is the real-time development of ethical frameworks that attempt to balance technological innovation with academic integrity. Many institutions are revising their policies quarterly or even monthly as they gain more experience with how AI impacts learning outcomes and assessment validity.

Finding the Balance: Proofreading Without Overstepping

For students attending institutions with stricter AI policies, the challenge becomes finding ways to benefit from AI's capabilities without crossing ethical lines. Many schools now explicitly prohibit AI-generated content or extensive AI revisions, but still permit basic proofreading assistance focused on grammar, syntax, and formatting.

This distinction is crucial. Using AI to identify technical errors in your writing is fundamentally different from having AI generate or substantially revise your content. The former preserves your original thinking while helping you present it more clearly; the latter potentially substitutes the machine's thinking for your own.

A Comprehensive AI Proofreading Prompt for Academic Writing

For students navigating these restrictions, I've developed a comprehensive prompt that instructs AI assistants to provide helpful proofreading feedback without crossing the line into content generation or substantial revision. This prompt is specifically designed to:

1. Identify technical errors without rewriting content

2. Flag style and structure issues without providing revisions

3. Offer general writing improvement strategies without doing the work for you

4. Keep the final intellectual and creative work firmly in your hands

Feel free to copy this prompt when working with AI assistants for proofreading:

# Comprehensive Seminary Paper Proofreading Prompt

## Instructions for the AI Assistant

I am a seminary student seeking proofreading assistance and writing coaching for my academic paper. Please provide feedback following these guidelines:

### Part 1: Technical Proofreading

1. **DO NOT rewrite any text or suggest rewrites.** Simply identify errors and passages needing clarity.

2. **Review my paper for the following issues:**

   #### Technical Issues
   - Spelling errors (American spelling required, flag British spellings)
   - Grammar mistakes
   - Punctuation errors
   - Basic formatting issues according to Turabian (9th edition) style
   - Citation formatting errors in footnotes and bibliography
   - Consistency issues (e.g., capitalization, hyphenation)
   
   #### Style and Structure Issues
   - Awkward or unclear passages (flag for revision without suggesting rewrites)
   - Failure to properly introduce quotes
   - Inconsistencies with Bible book abbreviations
   - Use of first and second person pronouns (to be avoided)
   - Deity pronoun capitalization consistency
   - Paragraphs containing fewer than three sentences (minimum requirement)
   - Excessively long paragraphs
   - Overly wordy content
   - Potential overuse of passive voice
   - Informal style or language (formal academic style required)
   
   #### Academic Integrity Issues
   - Potential plagiarism indicators
   - Potential AI-generated content indicators

3. **Provide a structured proofreading report with these sections:**
   - **Basic Statistics:** Word count and approximate reading time
   - **Spelling and Word Choice Issues:** List misspelled words and British spellings
   - **Grammar Issues:** Identify grammatical errors
   - **Punctuation Problems:** Note punctuation errors
   - **Style and Structure Issues:** Flag awkward passages, short paragraphs, etc.
   - **Academic Voice Issues:** Note personal pronouns, informal language, passive voice
   - **Turabian Style Issues:** List formatting inconsistencies with Turabian guidelines
   - **Citation and Quote Format Errors:** Identify citation issues and improper quote introductions
   - **Academic Integrity Concerns:** Note any potential plagiarism or AI usage indicators
   - **Bible Reference Format Issues:** Note inconsistent abbreviations

4. **For each issue, please provide:**
   - The location (page number, paragraph number, or quote a few words for context)
   - The specific issue identified
   - The relevant Turabian rule (if applicable)
   - DO NOT provide the corrected version

### Part 2: Writing Improvement Coaching

In this section, provide general guidance on how to improve my writing based on patterns observed. This should include:

1. **Pattern Analysis:** Identify recurring issues in my writing (e.g., "I noticed you consistently struggle with introducing quotations effectively")

2. **Improvement Strategies:** For each pattern identified, suggest 2-3 general strategies that could help improve my writing (without revising specific sentences), such as:
   - For awkward passages: "Consider reading problematic sentences aloud to identify unclear phrasing"
   - For passive voice overuse: "Try identifying the actor for each action and placing them at the beginning of sentences"

3. **Academic Writing Resources:** Suggest 2-3 specific resources (style guides, books, or academic websites) that address my particular writing challenges

4. **Strengths Assessment:** Briefly note 2-3 strengths in my writing to reinforce positive practices

5. **Focus Areas:** Recommend 2-3 priority areas to focus on for my next paper based on the most significant issues identified

The coaching section should provide general guidance that helps me develop as a writer without doing the revision work for me. Do not provide specific rewrites of my text.

PASTE OR ATTACH YOUR COMPLETE PAPER BELOW to receive both proofreading feedback and writing improvement coaching:

[PASTE YOUR PAPER HERE]

Know Your School's Policies

While this prompt is designed to respect academic integrity by keeping AI in a supportive rather than generative role, it's essential to understand and adhere to your specific institution's policies. Some schools may prohibit any use of AI tools in academic work, while others may have nuanced guidelines about acceptable use cases.

Before using this or any AI-assisted approach:

1. Review your institution's current AI policy - Check student handbooks, course syllabi, and academic integrity statements for specific guidance.

2. Consult with professors - When in doubt, discuss your intended use of AI tools with your instructors before submitting work.

3. Document your process - Some institutions require disclosure of the AI tools used in preparing academic work.

4. Stay informed about policy updates - As mentioned earlier, these policies are evolving rapidly.

The Future of AI in Academia

As we continue this conversation about the appropriate use of AI in academic settings, remember that the goal isn't to reject technological advancements categorically but to integrate them thoughtfully into our educational frameworks. The most successful approaches will likely be those that view AI as a tool for enhancing human thinking rather than replacing it.

The prompt provided here represents one attempt at finding this balance—using AI capabilities to identify technical issues while preserving the intellectual development that comes from wrestling with ideas and expression on your own.

How does your institution approach AI use in academic work? I'd love to hear about the different policies emerging across educational settings. Share your experiences in the comments below.

---

This article provides general guidance on using AI tools in academic settings. Please always prioritize your institution's specific policies over general advice found online.

Author's Note: In the spirit of academic integrity, I acknowledge the collaborative use of AI-assisted tools in the preparation of this article. These tools aided in research compilation, source suggestions, and editorial review. However, the core ideas, analysis, and final composition remain my own. All AI contributions were carefully prompted, evaluated, and integrated under my direction. As educators and students, it's crucial that we maintain high standards of scholarship while navigating the evolving landscape of research tools responsibly. This approach enhances rather than replaces critical thinking and original academic work.